Bookmark and Share

Is Strategic Foreclosing The Best Loan Modification For You

by Andrew on November 19, 2009

If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!

Last week I received a very interesting comment on one of my articles on loan modifications. The comment claimed that for most underwater borrowers (homeowners that owe more on their property than it is worth) a “strategic default” is smartest way to go.

I had some months ago written an article claiming along similar lines that in many cases foreclosure is the only logical conclusion when homeowners had overspent on their homes and could no longer afford the overpriced luxury homes they had unwisely bought at the crest of the housing boom.

Readers response ranged from claims that greedy buyers had it coming and deserved to lose homes they should never had bought to angry comments from people that felt my cold perspective was detached from the real plight of homeowners.

Opinions on the issue of loan modifications typically polarize to these two opposite views. 1) That loan modifications are an unwelcome intervention to the “natural” forces of free market and 2) that “saving” troubled homeowners is the responsibility of Government and the god given right of homeowners.

The comment I mentioned above intertwined these two views in an arguably “immoral” but very pragmatic perspective that you will hate or love.

The proposition is that if done smartly a foreclosure can provide a clean slate for troubled homeowners that can’t realistically save their homes. Banks won’t like this option but homeowners need to care for themselves, banks certainly do so.  These are the steps our anonymous commentator suggests, with some gentle editing:

1)      Let the lender foreclose. During this time you will of course not have to pay your mortgage payments.
2)      Just before your property is to be sold declare bankruptcy. This will wipe out all liability for the mortgage debt, if this is an issue in your state, eliminate all other unsecured debt and in the process buy you a few more months to move and during which you can save your mortgage payments towards your move.
3)      Start rebuilding your life. The market is a mess now anyway and most likely will continue like this for several years. Your credit will be destroyed by the bankruptcy and will appear on credit reports for 7 to 10 years but during this time you can rent while your credit scores improve. In two to three years you could have a decent credit score if you don’t get into more trouble. After only 2 years of a bankruptcy you can qualify for loans that allow for persons who have had a foreclosure/bankruptcy, like FHA for example.

Editors note: Bankruptcy laws have tightened up a bit so this “advice” might be underestimating how many years you will be unable to take a loan and the annoying detail that the government will be pretty much running your financial life for you for years after declaring bankruptcy.

This option is not a great one for loan modification agents, as they don’t get any money out of it but might be a good option for some troubled homeowners.

I must say that I don’t feel this option is a responsible or moral way of dealing with debt but it is another option. Unfortunately the credit culture we live in moves people to spend money they don’t have on things they don’t need. The idea that all that waste can be made to disappear with a convenient bankruptcy does not seem fair. However there are many homeowners that have fallen into dire straits without being irresponsible because of unemployment and the drop in house prices.

Last 3 posts by Andrew

Related posts:

  1. Loan Modification Alternatives: Wells Fargo Interest Only Loans
  2. Obamas Loan Modification Success Explained
  3. TARP, Loan Modification And Other Disaster stories.
  4. Loan Modification Alternatives: Is Renting Your Home A Viable Option
  5. Loan Modification Alternative: Is Renting Your Home a Good Option

  • It's hard to argue the ethics of making such a decision. The fact is that when someone buys a home, they enter into a contract. If they pay the mortgage, they get to stay in the nice home. If they don't pay the mortgage, they lose the house. Those are the rules. The bank agreed to them and the homeowner agreed to them. If everybody agreed to them at the time of purchase, then a strategic foreclosure or default is still playing within the established rules. Morals have nothing to do with it IMO. It is black and white.

    Imagine you rent a movie a movie from redbox. You spend $1 and enter into a contract to rent the movie for a night. You decide to keep it for a week instead. Redbox will charge you for every night you keep it. It was in the contract that you originally agreed to.

    Walking away is simply a tool in the tool box.
  • David
    Editors note has to do with the means test and whether one qualifies for a Chapter 7 or Chapter 13 for a bankruptcy filing. If someone qualifies for a Chapter 7, which is easy to do for most families, the editor's note would not apply and the debts would be discharged in approximately 90 days. For you individual circumstances, you should could consult a local attorney in your area who specializes in bankruptcy law to see if you qualify for a Chapter 7. Regardless, even a Chapter 13 allows you to pay pennies on the dollar and give you an opportunity to restructure and move on with your life.
  • It may be a wise "financial" decision for many folks to walk away from their homes. For example, if you were 60 years old and were upside down by $100k to $200k what is your best option? Is the best option to pay off your mortgage that is upside down even when you are in retirement?
  • It may be a wise "financial" decision for many folks to walk away from their homes. For example, if you were 60 years old and were upside down by $100k to $200k what is your best option? Is the best option to pay off your mortgage that is upside down even when you are in retirement?
  • It may be a wise "financial" decision for many folks to walk away from their homes. For example, if you were 60 years old and were upside down by $100k to $200k what is your best option? Is the best option to pay off your mortgage that is upside down even when you are in retirement?
blog comments powered by Disqus

Previous post: Loan Modifications: 3 Reasons They Are So Slow

Next post: Details on the Home Buyer Tax Credit Extension