<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Would One Mortgage Regulator Work?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blownmortgage.com/2009/05/21/would-one-mortgage-regulator-work/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blownmortgage.com/2009/05/21/would-one-mortgage-regulator-work/</link>
	<description>#1 Free Home Loan Modification &#38; Debt Relief Help For US Home Owners - Truths, Facts &#38; News About the Mortgage Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 22:42:54 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Wood pellet production</title>
		<link>http://blownmortgage.com/2009/05/21/would-one-mortgage-regulator-work/comment-page-1/#comment-69857</link>
		<dc:creator>Wood pellet production</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 16:45:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blownmortgage.com/?p=3056#comment-69857</guid>
		<description>While this would include interest, this does NOT include taxes, homeowners insurance, or PMI (private mortgage insurance) which you undoubtedly will have on a mortgage above an 80% loan to value ratio.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While this would include interest, this does NOT include taxes, homeowners insurance, or PMI (private mortgage insurance) which you undoubtedly will have on a mortgage above an 80% loan to value ratio.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Commercial photography</title>
		<link>http://blownmortgage.com/2009/05/21/would-one-mortgage-regulator-work/comment-page-1/#comment-69819</link>
		<dc:creator>Commercial photography</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 20:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blownmortgage.com/?p=3056#comment-69819</guid>
		<description>Norwich Photographer covering Commercial, Studio and Advertising Photography.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Norwich Photographer covering Commercial, Studio and Advertising Photography.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Commercial photography</title>
		<link>http://blownmortgage.com/2009/05/21/would-one-mortgage-regulator-work/comment-page-1/#comment-69818</link>
		<dc:creator>Commercial photography</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 20:43:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blownmortgage.com/?p=3056#comment-69818</guid>
		<description>Norwich Photographer covering Commercial, Studio and Advertising Photography.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Norwich Photographer covering Commercial, Studio and Advertising Photography.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Affordable Web Hosting</title>
		<link>http://blownmortgage.com/2009/05/21/would-one-mortgage-regulator-work/comment-page-1/#comment-69416</link>
		<dc:creator>Affordable Web Hosting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 15:05:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blownmortgage.com/?p=3056#comment-69416</guid>
		<description>Generally accepted accounting principles call for writing off the bad debt and assets to correctly reflect the real financial status of a bank. Regulators should demand the bad loans be written off, immediately!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Generally accepted accounting principles call for writing off the bad debt and assets to correctly reflect the real financial status of a bank. Regulators should demand the bad loans be written off, immediately!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Affordable Web Hosting</title>
		<link>http://blownmortgage.com/2009/05/21/would-one-mortgage-regulator-work/comment-page-1/#comment-69414</link>
		<dc:creator>Affordable Web Hosting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 15:04:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blownmortgage.com/?p=3056#comment-69414</guid>
		<description>Generally accepted accounting principles call for writing off the bad debt and assets to correctly reflect the real financial status of a bank. Regulators should demand the bad loans be written off, immediately!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Generally accepted accounting principles call for writing off the bad debt and assets to correctly reflect the real financial status of a bank. Regulators should demand the bad loans be written off, immediately!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Captain Ned</title>
		<link>http://blownmortgage.com/2009/05/21/would-one-mortgage-regulator-work/comment-page-1/#comment-69316</link>
		<dc:creator>Captain Ned</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 20:57:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blownmortgage.com/?p=3056#comment-69316</guid>
		<description>@ Exercise Programs:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We do.  If I see loss in a credit when I&#039;m on a bank exam, I call for the loss to be charged off.  The sticky part is that this only pertains to commercial credits.  Mortgage credit is classified by delinquency under the Revised Uniform Credit Classification and Account Management Policy issued by the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council in March 1999.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dallasfed.org/banking/notices/1999/not9917.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.dallasfed.org/banking/notices/1999/n...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Under this policy, which has yet to be altered, FFIEC states that the Policy is GAAP-compliant.  It further states that mortgage loans past due 90 days or more are to be classified Substandard.  There is no provision in the policy for assigning a Loss classification to mortgage loans until and unless the loan is actually foreclosed and the property becomes REO.  I can look at a mortgage loan and know there&#039;s loss in that loan.  By the published policy standards, I can&#039;t force banks to write down crappy mortgage loans if they&#039;re not delinquent.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The life of a field regulator (Hello!!) is a constant battle between the real world and the crazy land of regulatory pronouncements.  I can&#039;t stray too far afield from the published text or else I&#039;m the one looking like Wile E. Coyote.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Give me better tools and I can make things happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Exercise Programs:</p>
<p>We do.  If I see loss in a credit when I&#39;m on a bank exam, I call for the loss to be charged off.  The sticky part is that this only pertains to commercial credits.  Mortgage credit is classified by delinquency under the Revised Uniform Credit Classification and Account Management Policy issued by the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council in March 1999.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dallasfed.org/banking/notices/1999/not9917.pdf" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.dallasfed.org/banking/notices/1999/n.." rel="nofollow">http://www.dallasfed.org/banking/notices/1999/n..</a>.</p>
<p>Under this policy, which has yet to be altered, FFIEC states that the Policy is GAAP-compliant.  It further states that mortgage loans past due 90 days or more are to be classified Substandard.  There is no provision in the policy for assigning a Loss classification to mortgage loans until and unless the loan is actually foreclosed and the property becomes REO.  I can look at a mortgage loan and know there&#39;s loss in that loan.  By the published policy standards, I can&#39;t force banks to write down crappy mortgage loans if they&#39;re not delinquent.</p>
<p>The life of a field regulator (Hello!!) is a constant battle between the real world and the crazy land of regulatory pronouncements.  I can&#39;t stray too far afield from the published text or else I&#39;m the one looking like Wile E. Coyote.</p>
<p>Give me better tools and I can make things happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Exercise Programs</title>
		<link>http://blownmortgage.com/2009/05/21/would-one-mortgage-regulator-work/comment-page-1/#comment-69314</link>
		<dc:creator>Exercise Programs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 18:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blownmortgage.com/?p=3056#comment-69314</guid>
		<description>Generally accepted accounting principles call for writing off the bad debt and assets to correctly reflect the real financial status of a bank. Regulators should demand the bad loans be written off, immediately!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Generally accepted accounting principles call for writing off the bad debt and assets to correctly reflect the real financial status of a bank. Regulators should demand the bad loans be written off, immediately!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oswin grant</title>
		<link>http://blownmortgage.com/2009/05/21/would-one-mortgage-regulator-work/comment-page-1/#comment-69309</link>
		<dc:creator>oswin grant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 15:37:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blownmortgage.com/?p=3056#comment-69309</guid>
		<description>I just came across your blog about Housing and wanted to drop you a comment telling you how impressed I was with the information you have posted here. I also have a web site &amp; blog about Housing Problems and Solutions so I know what I&#039;m talking about when I say your site is top-notch! Keep up the great work, you are providing a great resource on the Internet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just came across your blog about Housing and wanted to drop you a comment telling you how impressed I was with the information you have posted here. I also have a web site &#038; blog about Housing Problems and Solutions so I know what I&#39;m talking about when I say your site is top-notch! Keep up the great work, you are providing a great resource on the Internet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Captain Ned</title>
		<link>http://blownmortgage.com/2009/05/21/would-one-mortgage-regulator-work/comment-page-1/#comment-69061</link>
		<dc:creator>Captain Ned</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 00:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blownmortgage.com/?p=3056#comment-69061</guid>
		<description>No.  It won&#039;t work.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A unitary regulator will by defintion be a Federal beast, and this beast will listen to the major players in the industry and water down any unitary regulation to the lowest common denominator.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you want to fix the business, amend the National Bank Act (governs national banks) and the Home Owners Loan Act (governs Federal thrifts) to state that institutions chartered under those acts must comply with the consumer protection laws in each and every state in which they operate.  That&#039;ll reverse through legislation the [i]Wachovia[/i] decision.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Second, repeal the provisions of the 1980 Depository Institutions Deregulation and Monetary Control Act that removed from states the ability to regulate rates and fees on first lien loans on dwellings.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We in the states tried hard to stop this trainwreck we all saw coming.  The OCC/OTS and SCOTUS told us to stand aside and wait so that we got stuck with the blowback.  Uniform regulation means nothing more than a race to the bottom and violently refuses to take into account any state or regional differences in how the business works.  Give us state-level regulators the power to regulate everyone who operates in our state and  there will be many more hides tacked to the wall than would ever occur under Federal unitary regulation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No.  It won&#39;t work.</p>
<p>A unitary regulator will by defintion be a Federal beast, and this beast will listen to the major players in the industry and water down any unitary regulation to the lowest common denominator.</p>
<p>If you want to fix the business, amend the National Bank Act (governs national banks) and the Home Owners Loan Act (governs Federal thrifts) to state that institutions chartered under those acts must comply with the consumer protection laws in each and every state in which they operate.  That&#39;ll reverse through legislation the [i]Wachovia[/i] decision.</p>
<p>Second, repeal the provisions of the 1980 Depository Institutions Deregulation and Monetary Control Act that removed from states the ability to regulate rates and fees on first lien loans on dwellings.</p>
<p>We in the states tried hard to stop this trainwreck we all saw coming.  The OCC/OTS and SCOTUS told us to stand aside and wait so that we got stuck with the blowback.  Uniform regulation means nothing more than a race to the bottom and violently refuses to take into account any state or regional differences in how the business works.  Give us state-level regulators the power to regulate everyone who operates in our state and  there will be many more hides tacked to the wall than would ever occur under Federal unitary regulation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leslie_A (Leslie Adams)</title>
		<link>http://blownmortgage.com/2009/05/21/would-one-mortgage-regulator-work/comment-page-1/#comment-69058</link>
		<dc:creator>Leslie_A (Leslie Adams)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 20:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blownmortgage.com/?p=3056#comment-69058</guid>
		<description>Is a separate Mortgage Regulator needed? (Blown Mortgage)
http://is.gd/C1z7</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is a separate Mortgage Regulator needed? (Blown Mortgage)<br />
<a href="http://is.gd/C1z7" rel="nofollow">http://is.gd/C1z7</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 1.360 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2009-11-11 01:40:19 -->
