Bookmark and Share

The bailout staggers on through Congress

by Morgan on October 3, 2008

If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!

A guest post by new Blownmortgage.com contributor, MG Dungan.  MG has gone from Wharton to Wall St. to real estate to Blown Mortgage. 

Update: Bill passes 263-171. See who voted yea or nay.

The Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 failed in the House?225 to 228? on September 29. In an unprecedented and unconstitutional move, the bill was sent to the Senate, loaded up with pork and overwhelmingly passed?75 to 24? with no substantive change to the provisions that caused it to be rejected by the House.

So, we want to know, where?s the stimulation?

What it won?t do:

1. Stimulate employment:

The plan has no direct affect on employment. Buying old bad debt from banks in exchange for brand-new, at-least-temporarily-good new debt does not decrease leverage, does not increase the money supply, and does not motivate banks to start lending. Really, who are they going to lend to in a rapidly deteriorating economy?

Further, it has little direct affect on employment other than on the Wall Streeters who will manage the pools of money.

It does not lighten the burden on Americans who are already in deep financial trouble; in fact, it increases the burden. The Treasury and Fed do not have an extra $700bn; they will have to borrow it. This bailout, the first tranche?not the whole thing, the first tranche? of which is $700bn, will be the largest tax increase in history.


 

2. Increase monies for mortgages:

Banks are not going to make mortgages on real estate that is rapidly decreasing in value, not should they. They are not going to give or refinance mortgages for people who do not have jobs. Anymore, that is. On the contrary, larger downpayments are being demanded and terms are tightening. There is even some anecdotal evidence of redlining, ironically in both low-priced areas and the highest price areas where real estate values are expected to erode fastest.

3. Increase, or even stabilize, sources of consumer debt:

Sources of consumer debt have been steadily drying up. HELOC lines are being frozen and cancelled, credit-card lines are being withdrawn, and other direct lines of credit, such as auto loans, are being cut off.

4. Free up other traditional sources of lending, like the bond market:

As an example, the front-page headline this morning in the LA Times: ?The state of California is the biggest of several governments nationwide that are being locked out of the bond market by the global credit crunch.

Plans by several state and local governments to borrow in recent days have been upended by the credit freeze. New Mexico was forced to put off a $500 million bond sale, Massachusetts had to pull the plug halfway into a $400 million offering, and Maine is considering canceling road projects that were to be funded with bonds.?

Municipalities have been coming to the bond market since the collapse of the ARS (Auction Rate Securities) market at the beginning of this year. Now that source of money has dried up.

The House is expected to vote on the revised plan today. As Drudge would say, developing . . .

Last 3 posts by Morgan

Related posts:

  1. Bailout Efforts Shift To Consumer Debt
  2. Here are the key housing bailout questions no one is asking
  3. Your stimulus – a drop in the bailout bucket
  4. Congress Adjournment and Artificial Deadlines
  5. Federal Reserve Board Testimony to Congress

  • Fielding Mellish
    Passage of the bailout was a g0ddamn shame. We don't have a liquidity crisis. We have a solvency crisis. They should have let it burn to the ground. This is like taking a cash advance on your visa to pay your HELOC. They're just kicking the can down the road. Home values will continue to fall because they're at fundamentally unsustainable levels in relation to household income & comparable rents. Letting the holders of collapsed financial assets take their lumps (whether on MBS's, CDO's or CDS's) would have meant foreigners taking a big hit. Paulson is afraid they'd stop financing our overall treasury debt. This bailout should have been called the Foreign Investor Protection Act. We should have thumbed our noses at foreign investors & taken our chances on our own. As it is, we've invited them to dump all sorts of crap in our laps, and it will end up costing a lot more than $700 bil.
  • mgdungan
    Right on, Fielding Mellish.

    All that and the stock market was down again today. Bloomberg says it's because the package wasn't big enough. Who decides these things? The country and the dollar have been weakened further.

    And so much for listening to the voters. There was an enormous grass-roots protest, which was ignored.

    Today's Friday. What will be bailed out this weekend?
blog comments powered by Disqus

Previous post: Inside a foreclosure

Next post: Wachovia, Citi and the FDIC or Wachovia, Wells Fargo and the Fed