Bookmark and Share

The Almost-Averted Crisis

by phillenbrand on September 24, 2008

If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!

Everyone is looking for someone to blame in regards to our current crisis.  Here are a couple of article excerpts which add some clarity to the whole picture.  First, an excerpt from the NY Times covering the Bush Administration’s push (in 2003!) for a new regulator to oversee Fannie and Freddie, along with new guidelines:

The Bush administration today recommended the most significant regulatory overhaul in the housing finance industry since the savings and loan crisis a decade ago.

Under the plan, disclosed at a Congressional hearing today, a new agency would be created within the Treasury Department to assume supervision of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the government-sponsored companies that are the two largest players in the mortgage lending industry.

The new agency would have the authority, which now rests with Congress, to set one of the two capital-reserve requirements for the companies. It would exercise authority over any new lines of business. And it would determine whether the two are adequately managing the risks of their ballooning portfolios.

The plan is an acknowledgment by the administration that oversight of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac — which together have issued more than $1.5 trillion in outstanding debt — is broken. A report by outside investigators in July concluded that Freddie Mac manipulated its accounting to mislead investors, and critics have said Fannie Mae does not adequately hedge against rising interest rates.

Both Freddie and Fannie responded favorably to the President’s proposal.  Unfortunately, some in congress were not so favorably disposed to support Fannie and Freddie Reform.  Rep. Barney Frank had this to say regarding the President’s proposal:

“These two entities — Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac — are not facing any kind of financial crisis,” said Representative Barney Frank of Massachusetts, the ranking Democrat on the Financial Services Committee. ”The more people exaggerate these problems, the more pressure there is on these companies, the less we will see in terms of affordable housing.”

With the administration’s push and Greenspan’s urging, the legislation appeared to be well on it’s way to becoming law.  However, as noted by Kevin Hassett of Bloomberg News, the legislation was dealt a fatal blow:

In 2005, 2006 and 2007, a blizzard of terrible mortgage paper fluttered out of the Fannie and Freddie clouds, burying many of our oldest and most venerable institutions. Without their checkbooks keeping the market liquid and buying up excess supply, the market would likely have not existed.

But the bill didn’t become law, for a simple reason: Democrats opposed it on a party-line vote in the committee, signaling that this would be a partisan issue. Republicans, tied in knots by the tight Democratic opposition, couldn’t even get the Senate to vote on the matter.

This is a developing story.  Expect more to follow.

Last 3 posts by phillenbrand

Related posts:

  1. Fannie Mae Rumor
  2. Fannie & Freddie Should Be Fully Privatized
  3. The Genesis of Our Current Mortgage Crisis
  4. Sub-prime Mess Leads to Global Summit
  5. Mortgage Bonds Rise Rates Could Follow

  • Recruiterrick
    So, Barney Frank is who you blame for the whole mess?

    That works for Phil Gramm.

    And Alan Greenspan.

    Also George Bush, and Neal, he desires no reference to Silverado.

    How about Paulson? GS made a lot of money selling thin air for trillions of dollars, it works for him, too.

    Bernanke, as soon as he can find the toilet paper for the wipe, will believe that may work for him also.

    Dang, I forgot, the Republicans controlled both houses of Congress, yet Barney Frank wasn't able to stop anything else, except proper regulation of FRE and FNM. Medicare reform went through even though the Democrats opposed it. No Child Left Behind went through, and the Democrats did not have enough votes to stop that. Both of these programs have cost more, and delivered less by every measure.

    Barney wasn't able to stop anything, except more regulation. So he became a Republican on that issue?

    Wow!

    I'm glad to finally see the light.

    Will your next story be that dinosaurs are a hoax perpetrated by the liberal elite?
  • bill Phillips
    No one seems to mention that both Fannie and Freddie were the biggest investors in both sub-prime and Alt A securities and whole loans. As last as a year ago they were still buying 100% ltv loans in Texas and Louisianna to borrowers who were not impacted by the hurricane.
  • I think the motivation behind this legislation was to kill a democratic patronage outlet, not to reign in the housing bubble.

    Indeed, if Greenspan was so concerned about the fundamentals, why was he advocating ARMs in 2004, with interest rates at 1%?
  • VultureTX
    @ Recruiterrick 17 hours ago 1 point
    ..." Dang, I forgot, the Republicans controlled both houses of Congress, yet Barney Frank wasn't able to stop anything else, except proper regulation of FRE and FNM. Medicare reform went through even though the Democrats opposed it. No Child Left Behind went through, and the Democrats did not have enough votes to stop that. Both of these programs have cost more, and delivered less by every measure. .."
    Wow the left must be desperate to outright lie about Medicare reform and no child left behind. Since obviously we all know the Democratic did co-sponsor both those bills. Ted Kennedy was a major factor. And hillary clinton supported NCLB too.

    And to toss in a strawman on Neal Bush, shows how far back they will go just avoid the truth and to claim the GOP was solely at fault.

    Of course that might be why the Democrats are in such a hurry this week, to bury before Frank;s and others actions are common knowledge. Then again they just like spending our money.
  • POHearn
    Well, as you know, minority parties can wield influence if they act in a untied manner. And the 2005 legislation was killed in committee, not on the floor.

    That is not saying this is strictly a Democratic or Republican party problem. I think people are too quick to want to blame one group or another, and that's not going to resolve the crisis we're in now.

    The problem at that time wasn't merely that oversight was lacking, the problem was also, in the main, congressional encouragement to Freddie and Fannie to better support low income families. And the definition of low-income families is high-risk sub prime mortgages.

    If you want to look at a lobbying agency that was one of the biggest players in pushing congress to get Freddie and Fannie into the sub-prime market, then learn what you can about "FM Watch" or "FM Policy Focus." This lobbying agency officially disbanded this year saying "our job is done," basically. When do lobbying agencies willingly disband?

    Regards,

    POHearn
blog comments powered by Disqus

Previous post: Congress Adjournment and Artificial Deadlines

Next post: Here are the key housing bailout questions no one is asking