Bookmark and Share

Bail out plan to help just 13% of borrowers in trouble

by Morgan on June 28, 2008

If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!

The bail out plan that Congress is hard at work trying to pass may not do much in terms of actually helping anyone.  Government estimates show that only 400,000 people could benefit from the new FHA-driven refinance/loan modifications while more than 3,000,000 folks are actually 60 days down (or late) on their mortgage.

This refrain is all-to-common in trying to solve the mortgage mess.  FHA Secure, remember that one?  How many folks are being helped there?  Not many.  Loan modifications?  You don’t see those coming through in huge numbers either.  The tough reality is that with so much money at stake, so much declining equity, so much debt, so little additional borrowing capacity there is very little room to actually do something that works.

Or maybe the answer is doing little is the best answer.

A great article from the New York Times on the plight of lawmakers whose ham-handed attempts at help continue to fall short of main-street needs.

Those stark numbers not only illustrate the challenges for the lawmakers trying to provide some relief to their constituents but also hint at what the next administration will be facing after the election. While the proposed program would help some homeowners, analysts say it would touch only a small fraction of those in trouble ? the Congressional Budget Office estimates it would be used by 400,000 borrowers ? and would do little to bolster the housing market.

?It?s not enough, even in the best of circumstances,? said Mark Zandi, chief economist of Moody?s Economy.com. The number of people who will be helped ?is going to be overwhelmed by the three million that are headed toward default.?

Last 3 posts by Morgan

Related posts:

  1. Fed study: Obama mortgage plan should give money to borrowers, not banks
  2. Fed: Housing Trouble through 2009
  3. From The Federal Reserve: Bail Out Bad Borrowers
  4. Why the increase in housing starts means trouble
  5. The trouble with the housing market

  • I think this is one of the serious problems with using FHA as a significant part of the solution in many of the areas with falling values. If the values don't bottom out and start moving back up - which seems unlikely to happen soon - FHA is going to inherit borrowers who will end up walking away from their mortgages because they owe more than their property is worth. With increased loan limits geared specifically to the very areas this is most likely to happen in, I see a lot of potential trouble in the future of FHA.
    Thanks!
    Carl Pruitt
    http://fhaloanadvice.com
  • DK
    How many of these 3mm are actually primary home mortgages versus people who bought multiple investment properties hoping to flip them for a profit? I know personally at least a dozen clients who own 3 or more investment proiperties they bought in the past 5 years, with little or no money down hoping to do this. They are now underwater on all of them and can't rent them out to cover the osts and they are gettting ready to be foreclosed on them. Should we the tax payer be bailing out peopel who made bad investments? If so, i want the goverment to bail me out on all the stocks i lost money on over the past fwe years too.

    My guess is out of 3mm mortgages, less than 1mm are primary homes.
  • alex
    wow...thats it. Figures!! For some real solutions to mortgage payment issues and defaults, The Payment Help Center is a great resource.
    http://www.paymenthelp.org
  • health1
    Somewhere on paper it reads that Casey Serin is the 'primary' resident --- on all 8 of his loans. Do we really think that the ham-fisted govt can craft something so carefully that doesn't bail out flippers? I want a bailout too in that case --- please bail me out because I don't make as much as a bankster.
  • well said - i agree. Determining primary residence is almost
    infeasible for all of these loans...
blog comments powered by Disqus

Previous post: Risk is still risk, no matter who manages it

Next post: The mortgage market turns a corner – Wachovia retires Pick-a-Pay