Bookmark and Share

Citi exposed to $60 billion in subprime loans – may need more cash

by Morgan on April 19, 2008

If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!

Citigroup, which posted another whopping $12 billion in mortgage-related write downs, still has exposure to $60 billion in subprime-related loan bets and will likely need to raise additional capital. In it’s quarterly earnings call during which the company announced a $5 billion loss tied to that ridiculous $12 billion disclosed that it still has direct exposure to $29 billion in subprime loans and $38 billion to LBO loans (leveraged buy-out). If you count in their exposure to dubious-quality Alt-A loans the total is at close to $80 billion.

From Market Watch on Citi’s $5 billion quarterly-loss:

Citigroup Inc. reported Friday another oversized quarterly loss as the company wrote down about $12 billion of soured mortgage investments and other credit-related items while adding to reserves for further losses on consumer loans.

“Valuations of our subprime-related exposures in fixed-income markets and leveraged-finance assets have further declined and credit costs in our consumer-lending businesses have increased,” CEO Vikram Pandit said in a press release.

From Market Watch and Citi’s $60 billion in subprime exposure:

Citigroup Inc. still has more than $60 billion of exposure to subprime mortgages and loans used to pay for leveraged buyouts, despite the giant bank taking a $12 billion first-quarter write-down.

Citi said it had $29.1 billion of direct exposure to subprime mortgage securities at the end of March. That’s down from $37.3 billion at the end of 2007. The bank also has $37.7 billion of exposure to leveraged loans, down from $43.2 billion at the end of the fourth quarter.

Citi also reported that it has $18.3 billion of exposure to securities backed by Alt-A mortgages, which were offered to more creditworthy borrowers but required less documentation. That’s down from $22 billion at the end of 2007.

I would argue that the $18.3 billion in Alt-A loans are just as suspect and dangerous to the company as the subprime loans. While many subprime loans are made to homeowners with bad credit, the Alt-A loans were made to specuvestors with little or no documentation that will be unable to afford the new mortgage payments when these Alt-A loans reset or recast in the near future. At least subprime homeowners typically want to stay in their homes, amateur investors (a la Casey Serin) may just walkaway, take their credit lumps and call it a day.

I say lump it in there and call it $80 billion worth of bad mortgage exposure. Plus commenter Ann reports that Citi announced layoffs of 9,000 yesterday – at least their trying to conserve the cash they have left. Although they will most-likely need to raise additional capital to weather the storm.

Citigroup’s Tier 1 capital ratio — a closely watched measure of banks’ financial strength — stood at 7.7% at the end fo the first quarter. That was below Harte’s 8.1% expectation.
A Tier 1 ratio below 8% will probably fuel speculation that Citigroup needs to raise more capital again, Harte said.

Last 3 posts by Morgan

Related posts:

  1. Goldman: Citi Exposed to $15 Billion in Write Downs
  2. $7.2 billion in new write downs for Citi – are we there yet?
  3. $1 Billion in a Month? Wachovia Loan Loses Pile Up
  4. AIG takes $5.4 billion 2nd quarter loss
  5. From the Obvious Department – subprime income fraud impacts $1 billion in loans

  • The mortgage market is nuts these days. I found some interesting info that Fannie Mae is removing their portfolio cap completely in March 08. This is major news considering that cap is designed to limit theirs, and in turn the government's exposure to mortgage liability. The cap is the highest it's been in history and now they're going to get rid of it completely. Seems mad to me. Here's the original article and it links to the sources. http://truthfullending.com/us-aaa-credit-rating...
  • Finn
    "Fannie Mae is removing their portfolio cap completely in March 08"

    Take a look at your calendar. Mine says April 08. So they either have removed the portfolio cap, will not remove it, or you got the month or the year wrong.
  • tsk
    Why no mention of the $800 Billion in notational value of what Citi calls below investment grade derivatives? (probably the major part of the nearly $1 Trillion in SIV's called QSIV's [Q is for qualified] that are still carried off balance sheet) Looks like significant loss potential to me. But I've been wrong before.
    tsk
blog comments powered by Disqus

Previous post: Merrill Plans to Cut 3,000 Jobs

Next post: Freddie joins Fannie in purchasing ‘conforming jumbo’s’