Bookmark and Share

McCain Calls for Restraint in Mortgage Crisis

by Morgan on March 25, 2008

If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!

John McCain is taking a different path in his response to the mortgage crisis that is gripping the nation and financial markets.  Where Hillary and Obama are touting multi-billion dollar packages for foreclosure assistance and loan modification, McCain is urging limited government intervention – preferring to let the mortgage mess sort itself out unless events occur that present systemic risks.A while ago I wrote about Hillary Clinton’s mortgage bailout plan and Barack Obama’s mortgage bail out plan, but noted that McCain was mum on the situation.  I wrote to McCain’s team at the time requesting more details on the Senator’s plan of attack but received no response.  Now the New York Times is covering the detail of his plan.From the New York Times article on John McCain’s mortgage bail out plan:

 Drawing a sharp distinction between himself and the two Democratic presidential candidates, Senator John McCain of Arizona warned Tuesday against vigorous government action to solve the deepening mortgage crisis and the market turmoil it has caused, saying that ?it is not the duty of government to bail out and reward those who act irresponsibly, whether they are big banks or small borrowers.? ?Rampant speculation? on both sides is the root cause of the crisis, Mr. McCain said. He placed part of the responsibility for the mortgage mess on lenders, who he said had grown ?complacent? in a rising market and as a result acquired a ?false sense of security? that caused them to ?lower their lending standards.? 

?Some Americans bought homes they couldn?t afford, betting that rising prices would make it easier to refinance later at more affordable rates,? he said. Later he added that ?any assistance must be temporary and must not reward people who were irresponsible at the expense of those who weren?t.?

While it is refreshing to hear this point of view of limited government intervention the one point I worry about is whether the support of big business will be continued at the expense of main street.   It’s easy to say “it’s not the government’s job” to bail out speculators; it’s another to stop the Fed and other bodies from doing just that.  We’ll remain cautiously optimistic that McCain can walk that fine line.What do you think? 

Last 3 posts by Morgan

Related posts:

  1. McCain’s Mum on Mortgage Reform
  2. Monday’s Blame Game: The S&L Crisis.
  3. The Genesis of Our Current Mortgage Crisis
  4. The Many Faces of the Mortgage Crisis
  5. Texas Blames Federal Government for Mortgage Crisis

  • Frank
    But the FED is bailing out the banks.

    Why not the borrowers?

    It seems to me that if nobody will help the stupid borrowers, we should not be bailing out stupid Bear Stearns, or lowering rates that cause everyone to spend more money.

    By lowering rates, and giving money to investment banks, they are cushioning the blow on the wealthiest, while the poorest still lose their homes.

    I'm for either bailing out nobody, or everyone. Bailing out just your friends is BS!
  • Frank - I agree completely. This administration is allowing that to happen. I was arguing that McCain should not allow socialism for the rich if he was elected. Bailing out the millionaires at the expense of the working man is a tired theme that needs to end now.
  • Morgan,

    I thought the same thing. What he says sounds good. Implimenting it is more challenging.

    Ethan Penner from the Wall Street Journal has some interesting comments on the whole bailout issue.

    I wrote about them at http://straighttalkaboutmortgages.blogspot.com/....

    Stay tuned, it's going to be interesting.

    Tom
  • Good post, I agree with you. I wonder if McKeating -- I mean, McCain -- would urge the Fed to show restraint on handing out hundreds of billions of dollars to the banks to save them from the foreclosure crisis. Or maybe what McCain means is that the government should step in to save multinational banks from bankruptcy, but not step in to save homeowners from foreclosure.

    I don't think a McCain government would be able to afford bailouts for banks or homeowners, though, with his promises of 1,000 year wars. That would really put the Fed's money-creation machine into overdrive, taking away potential bailouts from insolvent banks. With a currency backed by bad mortgage debt, more spending of any kind will be tough.
  • mikew
    McCain is right on. And if what i understand is true that between 2 and 4% of American properties are in foreclosure than it would make sense that between 96 and 94% of Americans should support him.
  • Thanks for pointing this out in your blog post. It inspired me so much I wrote a reply and posted it on my blog. The gist of my reply is that John mcCain has lumped the average American homeowner in with big corporations as speculative investors. He sees no reason to help out either. Wonder what he thinks of the Bear Stearns bail out?
blog comments powered by Disqus

Previous post: Dear New York Fed…

Next post: Refi Activity Jumps on Fed Move