Bookmark and Share

How many Fronts can the NAMB survie?

by phillenbrand on December 18, 2007

If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!

Required reading:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119798901839036859.html?mod=googlenews_wsj

The staff proposal would also “generally” ban lenders from “directly or indirectly paying mortgage brokers in connection with consumer credit transactions secured by a consumer’s principal dwelling, unless the mortgage broker enters into a written agreement with the consumer” and provides certain disclosures. Creditors wouldn’t be banned from paying brokers if the compensation isn’t determined by the borrower’s interest rate (YSP).

Fed staff also are proposing to ban lenders from structuring traditionally “closed-end” mortgage products as “open-ended.” Fed staff believes this is necessary to prevent lenders from trying to evade the new protections.

The new proposal would apply to loans secured by the consumer’s principal dwelling where the annual percentage rate exceeds the yield on comparable Treasury securities (30-year now at 4.53%, 5-yr now at 3.50%) by at least three percentage points on first-lien loans, or five percentage points for second-lien loans.

So the axe is gonna fall, one way or another.  What are we going to do about it?

Last 3 posts by phillenbrand

Related posts:

  1. When is refinancing your mortgage not a good idea
  2. Secured Funding featured in ‘Orange County Cesspool’
  3. What does no-cost loan refinancing cost you
  4. Secured Funding Closes
  5. H.R. 3915 Mortgage Reform Bill Passes Committee with Important Changes

  • At least they are trying to protect the public, misselling is a bad thing and pretty unethical.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Previous post: Fannie and Freddie in the Jumbo market?

Next post: “Yes, but how many people is it REALLY going to help?”