<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Countrywide Eliminates Interest Only Qualification</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blownmortgage.com/2007/11/15/countrywide-eliminates-interest-only-qualification/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blownmortgage.com/2007/11/15/countrywide-eliminates-interest-only-qualification/</link>
	<description>#1 Free Home Loan Modification &#38; Debt Relief Help For US Home Owners - Truths, Facts &#38; News About the Mortgage Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 13:19:13 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Changing Mortgage criteria &#124; easyclickhomes.com</title>
		<link>http://blownmortgage.com/2007/11/15/countrywide-eliminates-interest-only-qualification/comment-page-1/#comment-6948</link>
		<dc:creator>Changing Mortgage criteria &#124; easyclickhomes.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 10:06:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blownmortgage.com/2007/11/15/countrywide-eliminates-interest-only-qualification/#comment-6948</guid>
		<description>[...] refinancing the loans they recived.  This just got harder.  As reported by Blownmortgage.com,  Countrywide and WaMu have changed their tones as far as who can get loans.  At Countrywide, requirements to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] refinancing the loans they recived.  This just got harder.  As reported by Blownmortgage.com,  Countrywide and WaMu have changed their tones as far as who can get loans.  At Countrywide, requirements to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tike</title>
		<link>http://blownmortgage.com/2007/11/15/countrywide-eliminates-interest-only-qualification/comment-page-1/#comment-6937</link>
		<dc:creator>Tike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 20:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blownmortgage.com/2007/11/15/countrywide-eliminates-interest-only-qualification/#comment-6937</guid>
		<description>But banks and thrifts are bound by the guidance regardless of whether they securitize the loans or not. I wonder how CFC got around the rule with the regulators.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But banks and thrifts are bound by the guidance regardless of whether they securitize the loans or not. I wonder how CFC got around the rule with the regulators.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S Hallman</title>
		<link>http://blownmortgage.com/2007/11/15/countrywide-eliminates-interest-only-qualification/comment-page-1/#comment-6926</link>
		<dc:creator>S Hallman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 14:36:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blownmortgage.com/2007/11/15/countrywide-eliminates-interest-only-qualification/#comment-6926</guid>
		<description>Tike - I have investors that still qualify at the I/O payment</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tike &#8211; I have investors that still qualify at the I/O payment</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fielding Mellish</title>
		<link>http://blownmortgage.com/2007/11/15/countrywide-eliminates-interest-only-qualification/comment-page-1/#comment-6909</link>
		<dc:creator>Fielding Mellish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 03:09:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blownmortgage.com/2007/11/15/countrywide-eliminates-interest-only-qualification/#comment-6909</guid>
		<description>I agree wholly with Tike.  I guess Countrywide&#039;s definition of &quot;guidance&quot; is: someting that will encumber our competitors but that we feel totally free to ingore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree wholly with Tike.  I guess Countrywide&#8217;s definition of &#8220;guidance&#8221; is: someting that will encumber our competitors but that we feel totally free to ingore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tike</title>
		<link>http://blownmortgage.com/2007/11/15/countrywide-eliminates-interest-only-qualification/comment-page-1/#comment-6903</link>
		<dc:creator>Tike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 01:34:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blownmortgage.com/2007/11/15/countrywide-eliminates-interest-only-qualification/#comment-6903</guid>
		<description>Wasn&#039;t the nontraditional guidance for IO and option arms passed last year? How were they getting away with not qualifying people at the fully amortized fully indexed rate? 

Its amazing the limits these guys push, it is more amazing that they get away with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wasn&#8217;t the nontraditional guidance for IO and option arms passed last year? How were they getting away with not qualifying people at the fully amortized fully indexed rate? </p>
<p>Its amazing the limits these guys push, it is more amazing that they get away with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://blownmortgage.com/2007/11/15/countrywide-eliminates-interest-only-qualification/comment-page-1/#comment-6892</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 23:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blownmortgage.com/2007/11/15/countrywide-eliminates-interest-only-qualification/#comment-6892</guid>
		<description>To continue - even a fixed I/O is effectively a lease, not truly a purchase of the home and only appreciation will give them enough equity to eventually sell for a complete wash. After a few years of paying the interest and seeing no appreciation, they will be as likely to default as they are now. Especially if we continue to see slow grinding depreciation (a more likely scenario). People tire of slowly going upside down.

Without some payment of principal, they have little to lose by an eventual default.

In other words: Renting (via an I/O in a flat or decreasing market) is just throwing money away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To continue &#8211; even a fixed I/O is effectively a lease, not truly a purchase of the home and only appreciation will give them enough equity to eventually sell for a complete wash. After a few years of paying the interest and seeing no appreciation, they will be as likely to default as they are now. Especially if we continue to see slow grinding depreciation (a more likely scenario). People tire of slowly going upside down.</p>
<p>Without some payment of principal, they have little to lose by an eventual default.</p>
<p>In other words: Renting (via an I/O in a flat or decreasing market) is just throwing money away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://blownmortgage.com/2007/11/15/countrywide-eliminates-interest-only-qualification/comment-page-1/#comment-6891</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 23:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blownmortgage.com/2007/11/15/countrywide-eliminates-interest-only-qualification/#comment-6891</guid>
		<description>This may &quot;eliminate&quot; a refi option for people who are in over their heads, but so?

If the only way they can stay in the house is to get another I/O loan that will likely put them back in this position after it resets then why do it? One last roll of the dice and hope that the price appreciation starts up again?

I am not one that thinks that hair of the dog is an appropriate cure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This may &#8220;eliminate&#8221; a refi option for people who are in over their heads, but so?</p>
<p>If the only way they can stay in the house is to get another I/O loan that will likely put them back in this position after it resets then why do it? One last roll of the dice and hope that the price appreciation starts up again?</p>
<p>I am not one that thinks that hair of the dog is an appropriate cure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.944 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2010-01-30 23:52:02 -->
