<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are Lenders Deliberately Stalling on Foreclosures?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blownmortgage.com/2007/09/23/are-lenders-deliberately-stalling-on-foreclosures/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blownmortgage.com/2007/09/23/are-lenders-deliberately-stalling-on-foreclosures/</link>
	<description>#1 Free Home Loan Modification &#38; Debt Relief Help For US Home Owners - Truths, Facts &#38; News About the Mortgage Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 02:53:18 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kapowich makes short-list of industry nominees on Greg Swann's Bloodhound Realty's Weblog</title>
		<link>http://blownmortgage.com/2007/09/23/are-lenders-deliberately-stalling-on-foreclosures/comment-page-1/#comment-4891</link>
		<dc:creator>Kapowich makes short-list of industry nominees on Greg Swann's Bloodhound Realty's Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 00:31:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blownmortgage.com/2007/09/23/are-lenders-deliberately-stalling-on-foreclosures/#comment-4891</guid>
		<description>[...] or Sooner * Brian Wilson ? Redfin, [Redfin] ?I coulda been a contender?? * Morgan Brown ? Stalling on foreclosures, Are Lenders Deliberately Stalling on Foreclosures? * Jay Thompson ? Refrigerator service, How to Save $94 on Refrigerator Service * Dan Green ? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] or Sooner * Brian Wilson ? Redfin, [Redfin] ?I coulda been a contender?? * Morgan Brown ? Stalling on foreclosures, Are Lenders Deliberately Stalling on Foreclosures? * Jay Thompson ? Refrigerator service, How to Save $94 on Refrigerator Service * Dan Green ? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kapowich makes short-list of industry nominees on Greg Swann's Bloodhound Realty's Weblog</title>
		<link>http://blownmortgage.com/2007/09/23/are-lenders-deliberately-stalling-on-foreclosures/comment-page-1/#comment-4890</link>
		<dc:creator>Kapowich makes short-list of industry nominees on Greg Swann's Bloodhound Realty's Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 00:31:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blownmortgage.com/2007/09/23/are-lenders-deliberately-stalling-on-foreclosures/#comment-4890</guid>
		<description>[...] or Sooner * Brian Wilson ? Redfin, [Redfin] ?I coulda been a contender?? * Morgan Brown ? Stalling on foreclosures, Are Lenders Deliberately Stalling on Foreclosures? * Jay Thompson ? Refrigerator service, How to Save $94 on Refrigerator Service * Dan Green ? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] or Sooner * Brian Wilson ? Redfin, [Redfin] ?I coulda been a contender?? * Morgan Brown ? Stalling on foreclosures, Are Lenders Deliberately Stalling on Foreclosures? * Jay Thompson ? Refrigerator service, How to Save $94 on Refrigerator Service * Dan Green ? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Odysseus Medal competition &#8212; Voting for the People&#8217;s Choice Award nominated posts is open &#124; BloodhoundBlog: Real estate marketing and technology blog &#124; Realtors and real estate, mortgages, lending, investments</title>
		<link>http://blownmortgage.com/2007/09/23/are-lenders-deliberately-stalling-on-foreclosures/comment-page-1/#comment-4732</link>
		<dc:creator>The Odysseus Medal competition &#8212; Voting for the People&#8217;s Choice Award nominated posts is open &#124; BloodhoundBlog: Real estate marketing and technology blog &#124; Realtors and real estate, mortgages, lending, investments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 19:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blownmortgage.com/2007/09/23/are-lenders-deliberately-stalling-on-foreclosures/#comment-4732</guid>
		<description>[...] Here is this week&#8217;s short-list of Odysseus Medal nominees: Kelly Roark &#8212; Agent 2.0, Agent 2.0: not-so-clever play on ?Web 2.0? or the future of real estate marketing?Brian Brady &#8212; Advertising to Ashley, Advertising to AshleyJay Thompson &#8212; Aaron Anglin, Tragedy Begets Triumph: Why I Love this CommunityBrian Brady &#8212; Cleaning up lending, Realtors Hold the Power to Clean Up LendingDaniel Rothamel &#8212; Facebook, Why Your Answer to, ?Are You on Facebook?? Will Determine the Fate of Your Business in 10 Years or SoonerDustin Luther &#8212; Make an impact, 7 Ways to Make an ImpactJillayne Schlicke &#8212; Deceptive advertising, Deceptive Radio Advertising in Mortgage LendingJoel Burslem &#8212; ActiveRain/Move, Move.com Tried to Buy ActiveRainJay Thompson &#8212; Refrigerator service, How to Save $94 on Refrigerator ServiceBill Leider &#8212; Opportunity costs, Internet Marketing And Opportunity Cost - Connecting The DotsSteve Leung &#8212; Hidden factors, Hidden Factors When Calculating a Home?s ValueJonathan Dalton &#8212; Real estate 2.0, Real Estate 2.0 and the Phoenix Real Estate ConsumerMichael Wurzer &#8212; Standards and monopolies, Good Standards Break Monopolies, Not Make ThemJeff Brown &#8212; Double-edged sword, Double-Edged Sword ? OR ? Planning &amp; Discipline ? What Does Your Retirement Look Like?Dan Melson &#8212; Sellers pays commissions, Why the Real Estate Buyers Agent&#8217;s Commission is Paid by the SellerPatrick Kapowich &#8212; Realtor licensing, Inside the Santa Clara County Association of Realtors? Convention. Buyer beware? No. It?s Licensees Beware.Jim Watkins &#8212; Down market?, Down Sales Market? Think Outside the BoxDan Green &#8212; Data is granular, Why Real Estate Data Is Granular And Not Mosaic, Or One More Reason To Stop Reading Real Estate HeadlinesBrian Wilson &#8212; Redfin, [Redfin] ?I coulda been a contender??Morgan Brown &#8212; Stalling on foreclosures, Are Lenders Deliberately Stalling on Foreclosures? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Here is this week&#8217;s short-list of Odysseus Medal nominees: Kelly Roark &#8212; Agent 2.0, Agent 2.0: not-so-clever play on ?Web 2.0? or the future of real estate marketing?Brian Brady &#8212; Advertising to Ashley, Advertising to AshleyJay Thompson &#8212; Aaron Anglin, Tragedy Begets Triumph: Why I Love this CommunityBrian Brady &#8212; Cleaning up lending, Realtors Hold the Power to Clean Up LendingDaniel Rothamel &#8212; Facebook, Why Your Answer to, ?Are You on Facebook?? Will Determine the Fate of Your Business in 10 Years or SoonerDustin Luther &#8212; Make an impact, 7 Ways to Make an ImpactJillayne Schlicke &#8212; Deceptive advertising, Deceptive Radio Advertising in Mortgage LendingJoel Burslem &#8212; ActiveRain/Move, Move.com Tried to Buy ActiveRainJay Thompson &#8212; Refrigerator service, How to Save $94 on Refrigerator ServiceBill Leider &#8212; Opportunity costs, Internet Marketing And Opportunity Cost &#8211; Connecting The DotsSteve Leung &#8212; Hidden factors, Hidden Factors When Calculating a Home?s ValueJonathan Dalton &#8212; Real estate 2.0, Real Estate 2.0 and the Phoenix Real Estate ConsumerMichael Wurzer &#8212; Standards and monopolies, Good Standards Break Monopolies, Not Make ThemJeff Brown &#8212; Double-edged sword, Double-Edged Sword ? OR ? Planning &#38; Discipline ? What Does Your Retirement Look Like?Dan Melson &#8212; Sellers pays commissions, Why the Real Estate Buyers Agent&#8217;s Commission is Paid by the SellerPatrick Kapowich &#8212; Realtor licensing, Inside the Santa Clara County Association of Realtors? Convention. Buyer beware? No. It?s Licensees Beware.Jim Watkins &#8212; Down market?, Down Sales Market? Think Outside the BoxDan Green &#8212; Data is granular, Why Real Estate Data Is Granular And Not Mosaic, Or One More Reason To Stop Reading Real Estate HeadlinesBrian Wilson &#8212; Redfin, [Redfin] ?I coulda been a contender??Morgan Brown &#8212; Stalling on foreclosures, Are Lenders Deliberately Stalling on Foreclosures? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2007 September 26</title>
		<link>http://blownmortgage.com/2007/09/23/are-lenders-deliberately-stalling-on-foreclosures/comment-page-1/#comment-4550</link>
		<dc:creator>2007 September 26</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 17:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blownmortgage.com/2007/09/23/are-lenders-deliberately-stalling-on-foreclosures/#comment-4550</guid>
		<description>[...] Are Lenders Deliberately Stalling on Foreclosures? - about NOD (Notice of Default) delays - thanks OE - Blownmortgage  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Are Lenders Deliberately Stalling on Foreclosures? &#8211; about NOD (Notice of Default) delays &#8211; thanks OE &#8211; Blownmortgage  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff's Moped</title>
		<link>http://blownmortgage.com/2007/09/23/are-lenders-deliberately-stalling-on-foreclosures/comment-page-1/#comment-4535</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff's Moped</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 07:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blownmortgage.com/2007/09/23/are-lenders-deliberately-stalling-on-foreclosures/#comment-4535</guid>
		<description>Morgan -  The difference is probably largely due to the fact that servicers are putting more emphasis on loss mit work than in years past.  As for their motives, I can only offer conjecture: concern over bad press if they don&#039;t do all they can before referring to FCL; PSA&#039;s requiring a certain level of loss mit before FCL; overt pressure from the OTS or other regulatory body pushing for a certain level of loss mit before referral to FCL.

My guess is that it is a combination of all the factors, no real driving one.  The other major change: 120 is the new 90.  Almost EVERYONE waits 120 days before referring to FCL now, again for various reasons; which was not the case back in the 1990s.

Cheers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Morgan &#8211;  The difference is probably largely due to the fact that servicers are putting more emphasis on loss mit work than in years past.  As for their motives, I can only offer conjecture: concern over bad press if they don&#8217;t do all they can before referring to FCL; PSA&#8217;s requiring a certain level of loss mit before FCL; overt pressure from the OTS or other regulatory body pushing for a certain level of loss mit before referral to FCL.</p>
<p>My guess is that it is a combination of all the factors, no real driving one.  The other major change: 120 is the new 90.  Almost EVERYONE waits 120 days before referring to FCL now, again for various reasons; which was not the case back in the 1990s.</p>
<p>Cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morgan Brown</title>
		<link>http://blownmortgage.com/2007/09/23/are-lenders-deliberately-stalling-on-foreclosures/comment-page-1/#comment-4522</link>
		<dc:creator>Morgan Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 00:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blownmortgage.com/2007/09/23/are-lenders-deliberately-stalling-on-foreclosures/#comment-4522</guid>
		<description>What I found interesting was after writing this I was reading the latest Economist and an article said that in the early 1990&#039;s 75% of all homes that were 90-days late were in foreclosure.  Today only 25% of all homes 90-days late are in the foreclosure process.  What gives?  Even with a lack of staff there seems to be a fundamental difference in process now.. any thoughts on that stat?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I found interesting was after writing this I was reading the latest Economist and an article said that in the early 1990&#8217;s 75% of all homes that were 90-days late were in foreclosure.  Today only 25% of all homes 90-days late are in the foreclosure process.  What gives?  Even with a lack of staff there seems to be a fundamental difference in process now.. any thoughts on that stat?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Feed Bag - Copenhagen Girls On Bikes</title>
		<link>http://blownmortgage.com/2007/09/23/are-lenders-deliberately-stalling-on-foreclosures/comment-page-1/#comment-4519</link>
		<dc:creator>The Feed Bag - Copenhagen Girls On Bikes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 23:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blownmortgage.com/2007/09/23/are-lenders-deliberately-stalling-on-foreclosures/#comment-4519</guid>
		<description>[...] Morgan Brown wonders aloud if Are Lenders Deliberately Stalling on Foreclosures? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Morgan Brown wonders aloud if Are Lenders Deliberately Stalling on Foreclosures? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Feed Bag - Copenhagen Girls On Bikes</title>
		<link>http://blownmortgage.com/2007/09/23/are-lenders-deliberately-stalling-on-foreclosures/comment-page-1/#comment-4520</link>
		<dc:creator>The Feed Bag - Copenhagen Girls On Bikes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 23:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blownmortgage.com/2007/09/23/are-lenders-deliberately-stalling-on-foreclosures/#comment-4520</guid>
		<description>[...] Morgan Brown wonders aloud if Are Lenders Deliberately Stalling on Foreclosures? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Morgan Brown wonders aloud if Are Lenders Deliberately Stalling on Foreclosures? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: visitor</title>
		<link>http://blownmortgage.com/2007/09/23/are-lenders-deliberately-stalling-on-foreclosures/comment-page-1/#comment-4472</link>
		<dc:creator>visitor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 22:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blownmortgage.com/2007/09/23/are-lenders-deliberately-stalling-on-foreclosures/#comment-4472</guid>
		<description>If not total conspiracy, many would be conveniently misunderstanding the rules of what is required of them.

May be someone can ask the banks (with a copy to SEC and thus force them to state the facts, whatever they may be) to officially state what reality is. If someone write to the bank&#039;s officer, the bank will have to, at a minimum, take a official position to which we can hold them. As a publicly traded corporation, they must also file form 8K and mention any adverse conditions. If someone asks them, at least they will not be able to deny awareness later.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If not total conspiracy, many would be conveniently misunderstanding the rules of what is required of them.</p>
<p>May be someone can ask the banks (with a copy to SEC and thus force them to state the facts, whatever they may be) to officially state what reality is. If someone write to the bank&#8217;s officer, the bank will have to, at a minimum, take a official position to which we can hold them. As a publicly traded corporation, they must also file form 8K and mention any adverse conditions. If someone asks them, at least they will not be able to deny awareness later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Johnson</title>
		<link>http://blownmortgage.com/2007/09/23/are-lenders-deliberately-stalling-on-foreclosures/comment-page-1/#comment-4466</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 19:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blownmortgage.com/2007/09/23/are-lenders-deliberately-stalling-on-foreclosures/#comment-4466</guid>
		<description>My totally unscientific happenstance: I have a short sael in the Houston area and the 2nd lienholder thinks they are the 3rd lienholder.  I wonder how much bad title work is out thereand what does that foreshadow as distressed sellers try to work out their situations?

I can see it now- first lien holder gets the house on the courthouse steps and then the second lienholder realizes they just got wiped out.  By the way, after a 2nd lien (20% leg) gets packaged into interest only and interest and principal CDO tranches, who is the lienholder?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My totally unscientific happenstance: I have a short sael in the Houston area and the 2nd lienholder thinks they are the 3rd lienholder.  I wonder how much bad title work is out thereand what does that foreshadow as distressed sellers try to work out their situations?</p>
<p>I can see it now- first lien holder gets the house on the courthouse steps and then the second lienholder realizes they just got wiped out.  By the way, after a 2nd lien (20% leg) gets packaged into interest only and interest and principal CDO tranches, who is the lienholder?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 1.401 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2009-11-07 11:54:33 -->
